数据政策协同如何驱动企业数字创新网络嵌入?——基于数据交易与数据开放双重视角

How does Data Policy Synergy Drive the Embedding of Corporate Digital Innovation Networks? From the Dual Perspectives of Data Trading and Data Opening

郑国强

2026 第 28 卷 第 03 期 页码 28-44

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2026.03.003

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

以数据交易平台与数据开放平台为载体的数据政策协同是推动数据要素市场化配置的重要抓手,也是驱动高质量数字创新网络构建的关键支撑。文章基于数据交易和数据开放双重视角,采用2009—2023年中国A股上市公司数据,实证探究数据政策协同对企业数字创新网络嵌入的影响效应。研究发现,相较于单一的数据要素政策,政策协同对企业数字创新网络嵌入的驱动效应更为突出。机制分析表明,数据政策协同通过“文化—信息—技术”三重媒介促进企业的数字创新网络嵌入,即数据政策协同增强了企业合作文化、推动了企业信息共享并提高了企业间的技术关联度。异质性分析表明,对于自身治理能力和声誉水平较高、行业壁垒较低和技术更迭较快以及所在地区市场分割较弱和产权保护力度较强的企业,数据政策协同的驱动效应更加显著。拓展分析表明,数据交易和开放平台协同建设可以与国家超算中心建设、创新型城市建设等政策产生互补共促效应。文章不仅为深化数据要素市场化改革提供了现实依据,也为推进数字技术创新体系建设提供了政策启示。

Driven by the new round of scientific and technological revolution, innovation competition among enterprises presents higher organizational network complexity. It is difficult for enterprises to meet the rapidly iterating market demand through closed innovation relying merely on internal resources, and the innovation model needs to evolve toward open network cooperation. Especially in the context of the digital economy, the embedding of digital innovation networks helps enterprises build multi-agent innovation collaboration relationships integrating the digital and real economy, thereby reshaping their competitive advantages in products and technologies. Meanwhile, the network embedding theory holds that data factors are the key to driving the construction of digital innovation networks. Government-led data trading and data opening platforms focus on the transaction and circulation of commercial data and the opening and sharing of government data respectively. They exert synergistic and complementary effects in unlocking the value of data factors and have a significant impact on driving enterprises to embed in digital innovation networks.

From the dual perspectives of data trading and data opening, this paper empirically examines the impact of data policy synergy on the embedding of corporate digital innovation networks using data of China’s A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2023. The results show that, compared with single data factor policies, policy synergy has a stronger driving effect on the embedding of corporate digital innovation networks. Mechanism testing indicates that data policy synergy promotes the embedding through three channels: culture, information, and technology. Specifically, policy synergy strengthens corporate culture of cooperation, facilitates information sharing, and improves technological correlation between enterprises. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the driving effect of data policy synergy is more significant for enterprises with higher internal governance capacity and reputation, lower industrial barriers, faster technological iteration, weaker regional market segmentation, and stronger property rights protection. Further analysis reveals that the coordinated construction of data trading and data opening platforms can generate a mutually reinforcing effect with policies such as the construction of national supercomputing centers and innovative cities. This paper not only provides empirical evidence for deepening the market-oriented reform of data factors, but also offers policy implications for advancing the construction of digital technology innovation systems.

参考文献

5 陈晓珊, 李晗菲, 刘洪铎. 数据资产信息披露与企业合作文化[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2025, (2). DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2025.02.006
6 陈艳利, 刘亚. 数据要素市场化配置与全要素生产率——来自数据交易平台设立的证据[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2024, (6). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-5230.2024.06.011
7 杜瑶, 陈贤孟, 张晓倩. 数据要素共享的数字创新效应[J]. 财贸经济, 2025, (12). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-8102.2025.12.011
8 付成林, 王德新. 数字经济与统一大市场的因果效应与作用机制——基于有效市场和有为政府视角[J]. 南方经济, 2023, (12). DOI:10.19592/j.cnki.scje.410515
11 韩奇, 杨秀云. 公共数据开放能否促进企业数字化转型?[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2024, (4). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-2382.2024.04.006
12 韩先锋, 勾亚楠, 肖远飞, 等. 数字生态文明建设中制度创新的力量: 政策协同赋能的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2024, (11). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2024.11.004
13 胡楠, 薛付婧, 王昊楠. 管理者短视主义影响企业长期投资吗?——基于文本分析和机器学习[J]. 管理世界, 2021, (5). DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2021.0070
16 李光勤, 李梦娇, 张廷海. 政府数据开放、营商环境与FDI流入[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2024, (6). DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2024.06.004
18 刘传明, 陈梁, 魏晓敏. 数据要素集聚对科技创新的影响研究——基于大数据综合试验区的准自然实验[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2023, (5).
21 沈坤荣, 林剑威, 傅元海. 网络基础设施建设、信息可得性与企业创新边界[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023, (1).
25 杨仁发, 陆瑶. 市场准入管制放松与企业长期投资——兼论耐心资本的形成[J]. 中国工业经济, 2025, (6).
35 郑志强, 何佳俐, 陈尧. 公共数据开放与企业数字技术创新[J]. 财经研究, 2025, (2).
36 Bharadwaj A S. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2000, 24(1): 169–196. DOI:10.2307/3250983
37 Blumberg M, Pringle C D. The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance [J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1982, 7(4): 560–569. DOI:10.2307/257222
38 Bronzini R, Piselli P. The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation [J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(2): 442–457. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.008
39 Deperi J, Bertrand O, Meschi P X, et al. An organizational learning approach to digital and non-digital firm acquisition behavior [J]. European Management Journal, 2022, 40(6): 873–882. DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2022.09.005
40 Harding J A, Swarnkar R. Implementing collaboration moderator service to support various phases of virtual organisations [J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2013, 51(23-24): 7372–7387. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2013.849824
41 Lieberman M B, Asaba S. Why do firms imitate each other? [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(2): 366–385. DOI:10.5465/amr.2006.20208686
42 Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, et al. Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 223–238. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
43 Runge S, Schwens C, Schulz M. The invention performance implications of coopetition: How technological, geographical, and product market overlaps shape learning and competitive tension in R&D alliances [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2022, 43(2): 266–294. DOI:10.1002/smj.3334
44 Wei Y L, Zhang J R, Cheng M Y, et al. Does data asset disclosure contribute to the market efficiency? Evidence from China [J]. Research in International Business and Finance, 2025, 73: 102549. DOI:10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102549
45 Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K. Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research [J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4): 724–735. DOI:10.1287/isre.1100.0322