内外贸一体化:设施联通与制度开放双轮驱动——基于中欧班列与自贸试验区的准自然实验

Integration of Domestic and International Trade: Driven by Both Infrastructure Connectivity and Institutional Openness—A Quasi-natural Experiment Based on the China-Europe Railway Express and Pilot Free Trade Zones

徐俊,王举

2026 第 28 卷 第 03 期 页码 75-89

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2026.03.006

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

中欧班列与自贸试验区是我国设施联通与制度开放的重要引擎,是助力企业实现内外贸一体化发展的强大支撑。文章将中欧班列与自贸试验区双试点视为准自然实验,以2012—2022年1615家A股上市企业为研究样本,采用多期双重差分模型检验“硬联通”与“软联通”叠加对企业内外贸一体化发展的影响效应及作用机制。研究发现,中欧班列与自贸试验区均能显著促进企业内外贸一体化发展,且二者具有叠加效应。异质性检验结果表明,中欧班列与自贸试验区叠加对国有企业、劳动密集型企业内外贸一体化发展的促进作用明显,且在企业生命周期呈U形特征。机制检验结果表明,中欧班列与自贸试验区既能提升国内市场一体化水平和强化国际市场联结,又能降低企业成本黏性和缓解融资约束,进而促进企业内外贸一体化发展。拓展分析发现,企业数字化转型是中欧班列与自贸试验区共同促进企业内外贸一体化发展的“催化剂”,且在西部地区的催化效果最好。因此,中欧班列与自贸试验区共同推进“软”“硬”联通,助力企业内外贸一体化发展,对我国构建新发展格局具有重要意义。

The China-Europe Railway Express (CRE) and Pilot Free Trade Zones (FTZs) are pivotal engines of China’s infrastructure connectivity and institutional openness, as well as robust pillars for enterprises to achieve integrated development of domestic and international trade. Taking the CRE and FTZs as a quasi-natural experiment, and 1615 A-share listed enterprises from 2012 to 2022 as the research sample, this paper employs a multi-period DID model to empirically test the impact and mechanism of the superposition of “hard connectivity” and “soft connectivity” on the integrated development of domestic and international trade. The findings are as follows: First, both the CRE and FTZs can significantly boost the integrated development of domestic and international trade, with a notable superposition effect between them. Second, under the combined effect of the CRE and FTZs, state-owned enterprises exert a demonstration effect in the integrated development of domestic and international trade; the promotion effect is most pronounced for labor-intensive enterprises; and from the perspective of enterprise life cycle, their combined effect exhibits a U-shaped characteristic. Third, from the perspective of the market integration mechanism, the CRE and FTZs can enhance domestic market integration and strengthen international market linkage, thereby facilitating the integrated development of domestic and international trade; while from the perspective of the market expansion mechanism, they can reduce cost stickiness and alleviate financing constraints, thus boosting the integrated development of domestic and international trade. Fourth, the digital transformation of enterprises acts as a catalyst for the CRE and FTZs to jointly promote the integrated development of domestic and international trade, with the most prominent catalytic effect observed in the western regions of China. In conclusion, advancing the integration of “hard connectivity” and “soft connectivity” through the collaborative development of the CRE and FTZs to support the integrated development of domestic and international trade is of great significance for fostering a new development paradigm.

参考文献

2 戴翔, 宋婕. “一带一路”倡议的全球价值链优化效应——基于沿线参与国全球价值链分工地位提升的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021, (6). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2021.06.006
7 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022, (5). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2022.05.007
15 刘啟仁, 吴绍永, 叶承辉. 自由贸易试验区建设与企业供应链风险——基于供需平衡视角[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2024, (2).
16 盛斌, 刘宇英. 走出产品“舒适区”: 企业数字化与出口产品转换[J]. 中国工业经济, 2024, (8).
19 孙楚仁, 张楠, 刘雅莹. “一带一路”倡议与中国对沿线国家的贸易增长[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2017, (2).
21 孙焱林, 李格, 高达. “一带一路”倡议能否改善劳动力错配?——来自中国地级市的经验证据[J]. 人口与经济, 2022, (2). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4149.2021.00.066
26 于恩平, 倪中新. “双碳”目标下企业绿色转型能提升金融资产配置效率吗?[J]. 统计研究, 2025, (6).
27 袁然, 魏浩. 高管海外经历与中国企业国际化[J]. 财贸研究, 2022, (5).
28 张红霞, 李家琦. “链主”企业创新如何推动链上企业高水平出海?——基于供应链关联视角的分析[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2025, (4).
29 张姣玉, 罗莉. 新质生产力赋能内外贸一体化: 逻辑理路与纾解方略[J]. 国际贸易, 2024, (3).
31 Beck T, Levine R, Levkov A. Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States [J]. The Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(5): 1637–1667. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01589.x
32 Bernard A B, Jensen J B, Redding S J, et al. Firms in international trade [J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2007, 21(3): 105–130. DOI:10.1257/jep.21.3.105
33 Dickinson V. Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle [J]. The Accounting Review, 2011, 86(6): 1969–1994. DOI:10.2308/accr-10130
34 Hadlock C J, Pierce J R. New evidence on measuring financial constraints: Moving beyond the KZ index [J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2010, 23(5): 1909–1940. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhq009
35 Kaplan S N, Zingales L. Investment-cash flow sensitivities are not valid measures of financing constraints [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000, 115(2): 707–712. DOI:10.1162/003355300554782
36 Melitz M J, Ottaviano G I P. Market size, trade, and productivity [J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2008, 75(1): 295–316. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00463.x
37 Myers S C. The capital structure puzzle [J]. The Journal of Finance, 1984, 39(3): 575–592. DOI:10.2307/2327916
38 Nunn N, Wantchekon L. The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa [J]. American Economic Review, 2011, 101(7): 3221–3252. DOI:10.1257/aer.101.7.3221
39 Weiss D. Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts [J]. The Accounting Review, 2010, 85(4): 1441–1471. DOI:10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1441