Interaction between the Government and the Market and Enterprise Strategy Realization: Empirical Evidence of China’s Road Confidence in BOE

Bu Danlu; Lan Zong

doi:doi:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2020.08.008

Home > All Issues > 2020 > No.08 > Article Details

Interaction between the Government and the Market and Enterprise Strategy Realization: Empirical Evidence of China’s Road Confidence in BOE

Bu Danlu, Lan Zong

Author Affiliations

Full Article | PDF Article(1424.5 KB) working paper View

3985

6558

Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 46, Issue 08, pp. 108 - 123 (2020) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2020.08.008

First published at:Aug 03, 2020

Summary

References

Summary

This paper discusses the specific process and mechanism of how the market realizes resource allocation under the guidance of the government and acts on the realization of micro enterprise strategy. After continuous tracking, we find that BOE has actively carried out layout around the national strategy, invested in many places, built production lines, and continuously strengthened innovation investment under the interaction of the government and the market. Through more than ten years of efforts, it has formed a relatively reasonable production line and production capacity layout nationwide, and finally made outstanding achievements in market, technology, brand, export and global competitiveness.

Based on the theoretical tools of the relationship between the government and the market, the relationship between the central government and the local government, and the life cycle of enterprises, this paper makes an essential analysis of the case phenomenon and draws the following conclusion: （1） In China, the government is not opposed to the market. Government support and market mechanism are important forces to promote the realization of national strategy at the micro level. It is also the concrete embodiment of China’s economic development road confidence. （2） Coordinating the relationship between the central government and the local government is an important guarantee for maintaining the unified leadership of the central government, mobilizing the enthusiasm of the local government and the market, and promoting the rational cross-regional distribution of enterprise investment. （3） The innovation effect of the interaction between government support and market mechanism has significant periodicity and hysteresis, and its economic effect is the result of enterprises’ multi-cycle development. Therefore, the realization of the strategic goal of the interaction between the government and the market needs a long-term process.

The contribution of this paper is that it breaks through the opposite perspective on the understanding of the relationship between the government and the market, reveals the experience of China’s economic development with the interactive operation mechanism in real cases, and provides a realistic basis for China’s road confidence.

Keywords

national strategy; government support; market mechanism; relationship between the central government and the local government; life cycle

[1] Bu D L, Huang J. Enterprise rent seeking and government’s benefit transfer: A case study of BOE[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2013, (6): 135-147. (In Chinese)

[2] Chen D H, Yao Z H, Xin F. Research on industrial policy and micro enterprise behavior in China: Framework, review and prospect[J]. Accounting and Economic Research, 2018, (1): 51-71. (In Chinese)

[3] Guan Z. Guan Zi[M]. Changchun: Times Literature and Art Press, 2008. (In Chinese)

[4] Han Q X, Huang X H. The world contribution of China’s Road[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2018. (In Chinese)

[5] Huang Q H. China’s industrial development and industrialization process in the past 40 years of reform and opening up[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018, (9): 5-23. (In Chinese)

[6] Lin Y F. Industrial policy and China’s economic development: From the perspective of new structural economics[J]. Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, (2): 148-153. (In Chinese)

[7] Ma K S. Das Kapital[M]. Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 1975. (In Chinese)

[8] Ma W C, He Z. Industrial policy, product market competition and corporate debt financing[J]. Accounting and Economic Research, 2017, (4): 71-90. (In Chinese)

[9] Mao Z D. On Ten Relationships[M]. Beijing: People’s Publishing House,1976. (In Chinese)

[10] Wang K M, Liu J, Li X X. Industrial policy, government support and corporate investment efficiency[J]. Management World, 2017, (3): 113-124. (In Chinese)

[11] Wen Y. The great industrial revolution in China[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2016. (In Chinese)

[12] Yao Y. Political and economic reasons for China’s economic achievements[J]. Research on Economics and Management, 2018, (1): 3-12. (In Chinese)

[13] Zhou L A. “Bureaucratic & economic markets” and China’s growth story[J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2018, (2): 1-45. (In Chinese)

[14] Chen D H, Li O Z, Xin F. Five-year plans, China finance and their consequences[J]. China Journal of Accounting Research, 2017, 10(3): 189-230. DOI:10.1016/j.cjar.2017.06.001

[15] Xu C G. The fundamental institutions of China’s reforms and development[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2011, 49(4): 1076-1151. DOI:10.1257/jel.49.4.1076

Cite this article

Bu Danlu, Lan Zong. Interaction between the Government and the Market and Enterprise Strategy Realization: Empirical Evidence of China’s Road Confidence in BOE[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2020, 46(8): 108-123.