During the period of 2003-2015, the relationship of trade credit and bank credit financing of Chinese industrial enterprises above a designated size showed a significant " complementary” growth pattern, being in sharp contrast to the extrude expectation under traditional " alternative financing” theory. Although the complementary patter can be explained by traditional " signaling theory”, this theory still does not sufficiently explain why trade credit grows in units combing with much more growth of bank credit, and why enterprise debt structure increasingly skews towards bank credit, especially when the GFC led the bank sector to a renewed bout of risk aversion and reduced the willingness of commercial banks to identify the " signaling effect”. The above background determines the following research tasks. Firstly, in addition to the western " signaling effect” hypothesis, how to construct a new complementation logic (e.g. capacity-driven hypothesis) is studied to explain why the relationship between bank credit and trade credit is dynamically transformed from substitution to complementation, and why bank credit, instead of being crowding out, eventually takes on more radical growth, which in turn leads to firm debt structure shifting toward bank loans. These introspections contribute to the localization interpretation of corporate debt structure distortion as well as to the formation mechanism of the rising level of bank credit dependence. Secondly, by observing the evolution characteristics (e.g. threshold value, magnitude of complementation coefficient) of corporate debt structure imbalance through subgroup tests and comparing their coefficient differences, the determinants which are able to adjust firms’ bank credit dependence and rebalance firm debt structure can be found out. These introspections contribute to the optimization of credit policies that aim to optimize firm debt structure, and correct firms’ bank credit distortion. On the basis of a literature review and the introspection of complementary logic, this paper puts forward the " capacity-driven hypothesis”, and investigates the determinants of firm debt structure distortion by introducing adjustment cost and R&D innovation. Using the data of Chinese manufacturing firms from 2003 to 2014, we develop a panel threshold model (Hansen, 1999) and obtain the following conclusions: firstly, the relationship between trade credit financing and bank credit financing is dynamically transformed from substitution to complementation when a firm’s production capacity goes beyond the first thresholdγ1, and the complementation coefficient (the bank credit changes corresponding to the trade credit growth in unit) moves forward to a higher level when capacity level goes beyond the second threshold γ2. The second " forward mutation” of complementation coefficient means that further capacity distortion makes corporate debt structure quickly shift to bank credit, which in turn contributes, from the perspective of capacity governance, to the understanding of the formation mechanism of firms’ bank credit dependence. Secondly, the rebalance ability of firm debt structure varies with types of firms. More specifically, firms with high R&D investment or lower adjustment costs are more capable of adjusting debt structure distortion and reducing their dependence on bank credit by implementing capacity governance. This subgroup test result reveals that our macro policy, with the intention of correcting debt structure distortion, has to renew the concern about innovation incentive and adjustment cost smoothing. The potential contributions of this paper are: (1)it has implications for complementation theory and helps to understand the micro-mechanism and transformation condition (threshold reference) of debt structure dynamics in the context of the Chinese economy by proposing the " capacity-driven hypothesis” (rather than traditional signaling hypothesis); (2) it reveals, through the introspection and empirical subgroup test, the impacts of R&D investment and adjustment costs on reducing offset of financial structure. This facilitates the optimization of credit policy.
/ Journals / Journal of Finance and Economics
Journal of Finance and Economics
LiuYuanchun, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YaoLan BaoXiaohua HuangJun, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Capacity Governance and Rebalance of Debt Structure: From the Perspective of the Relationship between Trade Credit and Bank Credit
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 44, Issue 02, pp. 29 - 43 (2018) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2018.02.003
Summary
References
Summary
Keywords
[1]Fan G, Wang X, Zhu H. NERI index of marketization of China’s provinces 2011 report[M]. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2011. (in Chinese)
[2]Liu Q, Huang J. How does product innovation affect firm’s markup[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2016, (11): 28-53. (in Chinese)
[3]Pu W, Zhang H. Financing risk, cash holdings and technological innovation investment[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, (5): 38-45. (in Chinese)
[4]Wang X, Fan G, Yu J. Marketization index of China’s provinces: NERI report 2016[M]. Beijing: Social Science Academic Press (China), 2016. (in Chinese)
[5]Wu N, Yu B, Sun L. Multiple structural breaks between trade credit and bank credit: A nonlinear relationship analysis based on threshold panel data model[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2017, (4): 73-81. (in Chinese)
[6]Xu M, Chen X. Corporate investment and the cost of capital: Evidence from China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2012, (3): 40-52. (in Chinese)
[7]Xu X. Study on effect of synergy and balance of corporate R&D and technology indraught: An empirical analysis on Chinese listed companies[J]. Economic Management Journal, 2013, (7): 47-55. (in Chinese)
[8]Yu B, Zhi S. The motivation of trade credit redistribution and governance effect: Evidence from the credit leakage of the Chinese listed companies[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2017, (4): 58-69. (in Chinese)
[9]Yu B. Trade credit extension, signaling effect and bank loan-An empirical analysis based on Chinese manufacturing listed companies[J]. Securities Market Herald, 2017, (1): 34-42. (in Chinese)
[10]Agostino M, Trivieri F. Does trade credit play a signaling role? Some evidence from SMEs microdata[J]. Small Business Economics, 2014, 42(1): 131-151. DOI:10.1007/s11187-013-9478-8
[11]Almeida H, Campello M. Financial constraints, asset tangibility, and corporate investment[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2007, 20(5): 1429-1460. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhm019
[12]Atanasova C, Wilson N. Disequilibrium in the UK corporate loan market[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2004, 28(3): 595-614.
[13]Atanasova C. How do firms choose between intermediary and supplier finance?[J]. Financial Management, 2012, 41(1): 207-228. DOI:10.1111/fima.2012.41.issue-1
[14]Baños-Caballeroa S, García-Teruela P J, Martínez-Solanoa P. The speed of adjustment in working capital requirement[J]. The European Journal of Finance, 2013, 19(10): 978-992. DOI:10.1080/1351847X.2012.691889
[15]Biais B, Gollier C. Trade credit and credit rationing[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1997, 10(4): 903-937. DOI:10.1093/rfs/10.4.903
[16]Chiu W-C, Peña J I, Wang C-W. Industry characteristics and financial risk contagion[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2015, 50: 411-427. DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.04.003
[17]Choi W G, Kim Y. Trade credit and the effect of macro-financial shocks: Evidence from U.S. panel data[J]. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 2005, 40(4): 897-925.
[18]Cole R. Bank credit, trade credit or no credit: Evidence from the surveys of small business finances[R]. Working Paper, 2010.
[19]Cull R, Xu L C, Zhu T. Formal finance and trade credit during China’s transition[J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2009, 18(2): 173-192. DOI:10.1016/j.jfi.2008.08.004
[20]Dhaliwal D, Judd J S, Serflin M. Customer concentration risk and the cost of equity capital[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2016, 61(1): 23-48. DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.03.005
[21]Emery G W. An optimal financial response to variable demand[J]. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, 1987, 22(2): 209-225. DOI:10.2307/2330713
[22]Fabbir D, Klapper L F. Bargaining power and trade credit[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2016, 41: 66-80. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.07.001
[23]Fisman R, Love I. Trade credit, financial intermediary development, and industry growth[J]. Journal of Finance, 2003, 58(1): 353-374. DOI:10.1111/1540-6261.00527
[24]Ge Y, Qiu J. Financial development, bank discrimination and trade credit[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2007, 31(2): 513-530. DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.07.009
[25]Hermes N, Kihanga E, Lensink R. The impact of trade credit on customer switching: Evidence from the Tanzanian rice market[J]. Journal of Development Study, 2012, 48(3): 363-376. DOI:10.1080/00220388.2011.615921
[26]Huang Y, Wang X. Does financial repression inhibit or facilitate economic growth? A case study of Chinese reform experience[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2011, 73(6): 833-855. DOI:10.1111/obes.2011.73.issue-6
[27]Kling G, Paul S, Gonis E. Cash holding, trade credit and access to short-term bank finance[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2014, 32: 123-131. DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2014.01.013
[28]Kohler M, Britton E, Yates T. Trade credit and the monetary transmission mechanism[R]. The Bank of England Working Paper No.115, 2000.
[29]Lin T-T, Chou J-H. Trade credit and bank loan: Evidence from Chinese firms[J]. International Review of Economics and Finance, 2015, 36: 17-29. DOI:10.1016/j.iref.2014.11.004
[30]Metlzer A H. Mercantile credit, monetary policy, and size of firms[J]. The Review of Economic and Statistics, 1960, 42(4): 429-437. DOI:10.2307/1925692
[31]Ogawa K, Sterken E, Tokutsu I. The trade credit channel revisited: Evidence from micro data of Japanese small firms[J]. Small Business Economics, 2013, 40(1): 101-118. DOI:10.1007/s11187-011-9344-5
[32]Petersen M, Rajan R. Trade credit: Theories and evidence[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1997, 10(3): 661-691. DOI:10.1093/rfs/10.3.661
[33]Schwartz R, Whitcomb D. Implicit transfers in the extension of trade credit[A]. Boulding K E, Wilson T F. The channels of redistribution through the financial system[C]. New York: Praeger, 1978.
[34]Severin E, Alphones P, Ducret J. When trade credit facilitates access to bank finance: Evidence from US small business data[R]. EFMA 2004 Basel Meetings Paper, 2004.
[35]Shaikh A M, Moudud J K. Measuring capacity utilization in OECD countries: A cointegration method[R]. Working Paper No. 415, The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, 2004.
[36]Sheng H, Bortoluzzo A, dos Santos G A P. Impact of trade credit on firm inventory investment during financial crises: Evidence from Latin America[J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2013, 49(S4): 32-52. DOI:10.2753/REE1540-496X4905S403
[37]Tsuruta D. Bank loan availability and trade credit for small businesses during the financial crisis[J]. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2015, 55: 40-52. DOI:10.1016/j.qref.2014.09.004
[38]Yang X. The role of trade credit in the recent subprime financial crisis[J]. Journal of Economics and Business, 2011, 63(5): 517-529. DOI:10.1016/j.jeconbus.2011.05.001
Cite this article
Yu Bo, Gary Gang Tian. Capacity Governance and Rebalance of Debt Structure: From the Perspective of the Relationship between Trade Credit and Bank Credit[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2018, 44(2): 29–43.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES