This study examines the current relationship between digital finance and traditional finance by using micro survey data. Because of various reasons, there are many blank areas and groups in traditional financial services, especially in remote rural areas. Therefore, the emergent digital finance is expected to fill the blank, and serve the areas and groups that traditional finance has yet served. Meanwhile, expanding business in rural areas has indeed become an important strategy for some Internet finance companies. However, we must clearly realize that the application of new digital financial technology, which is a combination of Internet technology and financial business, needs basic financial knowledge and Internet skills. Without basic financial knowledge and Internet skills, people may not be able to use digital financial services skillfully and effectively. Therefore, although Internet finance could overcome geographical obstacles and cut the cost in remote rural areas with low population density and economic activity density, for the perspective of the demand side, it is not so easy to enjoy these modern digital financial services. Therefore, examining the relationship between traditional financial basis and farmers’ use of digital finance through scientific empirical analysis will contribute to deepen our understanding of the digital financial pattern. In this study, we use the firsthand micro survey data from the Thousand Village Survey of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics to investigate the influence of traditional financial foundation and family members’ education level on the use of digital finance. Using the special survey data of Rural Inclusive Finance will help us to inspect the value of traditional financial basis in influencing rural households to use new digital financial services. We find that the higher the frequency of using traditional finance, the greater the possibility of using digital financial services; and the higher the education level of farmers’ household, the higher the probability of using digital finance. In order to overcome the endogenous problems, we take " the time required for family to reach the bank outlet” and " how many ATMs in the village” as instrumental variables for the family to use traditional financial services, and carry out two-stage least square regression. In addition, in order to more intuitively examine the relationship among traditional finance, family education level and digital finance, we also make a brief analysis of the reasons why farmers do not use digital finance and the willingness of households who do not use Internet finance at present, which also confirm that the lack of financial basis and education is the strongest marginal obstacle affecting the spread of Internet finance. Digital finance also relies on the mass basis laid down by traditional finance. This study is a supplement to the existing literature, because when discussing the relationship between Internet finance and traditional finance, the existing literature can only start from the macro and policy perspective, lacking the micro basis. From the perspective of policy reference value, it is also of great practical significance for us to understand the practical value of the new digital finance and formulate the rural financial policy of digital finance going into the countryside.
/ Journals / Journal of Finance and Economics
Journal of Finance and Economics
LiuYuanchun, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YaoLan BaoXiaohua HuangJun, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Traditional Financial Basis,Knowledge Threshold and Digital Finance for Farmers
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 46, Issue 01, pp. 19 - 33 (2020) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2020.01.002
Summary
References
Summary
Keywords
[1]Cheng X. Discussion on the complementary and integrated development of traditional finance and internet finance[J]. Financial Foresight, 2015, (11): 61-64. (In Chinese)
[2]Dong Y, Liu T, Lu Z. The practical needs, difficulties and suggestions of rural internet finance[J]. New Finance, 2016, (11): 32-26. (In Chinese)
[3]Guo F, Kong T, Wang J. The spatial agglomeration effect of internet finance: Evidence from the financial development index[J]. Studies of International Finance, 2017, (8): 75-85. (In Chinese)
[4]Guo F, Wang J, Wang F, Kong T, Zhang X, Cheng Z. Measuring China’s digital inclusive finance in China: Index compilation and spatial characteristics[J]. China Economic Quarterly, Forthcoming.
[5]He J, Tian Y, Liu T, Li Q. How far is internet finance from farmers? Internet financial exclusion in developing area[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2017, (11): 70-84. (In Chinese)
[6]Jiao J. Analysis on the application of mobile payment in promoting the inclusive financial development and related policy suggestions[J]. China Business and Market, 2014, (7): 7-10. (In Chinese)
[7]Jiao J, Huang T, Wang T, Zhang S, Wang Z. An empirical study on the development process of inclusive finance in China[J]. Shanghai Finance, 2015, (4): 12-22. (In Chinese)
[8]Jiao J, Sun T, Huang T, Wang T. Digital currency and the development of financial inclusions: The theoretical framework, international practice and regulatory system[J]. Financial Regulation Research, 2015, (7): 19-35. (In Chinese)
[9]Li J. My thought on the finance of the network[J]. Management World, 2015, (7): 1-7. (In Chinese)
[10]Liu L, Shen X, Guo B. The development of internet finance and its impact on the traditional financial models[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2013, (8): 73-83. (In Chinese)
[11]Su F, Fang L. Regional differences of financial exclusion in rural China: Undersupply or insufficient demand[J]. Management World, 2016a, (9): 70-83. (In Chinese)
[12]Su F, Fang L. Active government and the development of rural inclusive finance: Based on ‘Thousands Villages Investigation’ of SUFE 2015”[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2016b, (12): 72-83. (In Chinese)
[13]Wang G, Zhang Y. A critique of internet finance[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2015, (1): 5-16. (In Chinese)
[14]Wang W, Zheng Y. The economic theoretical basis of the development of internet finance[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2015, (6): 170-176. (In Chinese)
[15]Wu Y, Song Q, Yin Z. An analysis of rural households’ formal credit availability and credit channel preference: Perspectives of financial literacy and education[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2016, (5): 43-55. (In Chinese)
[16]Xie P, Zou C. A study on internet based finance model[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2012, (12): 11-22. (In Chinese)
[17]Xie P, Zou C, Liu H. The fundamental theory of internet finance[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2015, (8): 1-12. (In Chinese)
[18]Yao Y, Shi D. Exploring regional differences in development of internet finance: Perspectives of path dependence and government interference[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2017, (5):127-142. (In Chinese)
[19]Yin Z, Wu Y, Gan L. Financial available, financial market participation and household portfolio choice[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2015, (3): 87-99. (In Chinese)
[20]Yin Z, Song Q, Yun W. Financial literacy, trading experience and household portfolio choice[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2014, (4): 62-75. (In Chinese)
[21]Zhang H, Yin Z. Financial literacy and households’ financial exclusion in China: Evidence from CHFS data[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2016, (7): 80-95. (In Chinese)
[22]Zheng L. China’s internet finance: Model, impact, nature and risks[J]. International Economic Review, 2014, (5): 103-119. (In Chinese)
[23]Zhu Y, Wang W. How does inclusive finance achieve precise poverty alleviation?[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2017, (10): 43-54. (In Chinese)
[24]Chen L. From Fintech to Finlife: The case of Fintech development in China[J]. China Economic Journal, 2016, 9(3): 225-239. DOI:10.1080/17538963.2016.1215057
[25]Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, et al. Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability?[J]. American Economic Review, 2010, 100(3): 1238-1260. DOI:10.1257/aer.100.3.1238
[26] Guo F, Kong S T, Wang J Y. General patterns and regional disparity of internet finance development in China: Evidence from the Peking University Internet Finance Development Index[J]. China Economic Journal, 2016, 9(3): 253-271. DOI:10.1080/17538963.2016.1211383
[27] Nasri W, Charfeddine L. Factors affecting the adoption of internet banking in Tunisia: An integration theory of acceptance model and theory of planned behavior[J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2012, 23(2): 1-14.
[28]Polatoglu V N, Ekin S. An empirical investigation of the Turkish consumers’ acceptance of internet banking services[J]. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 2001, 19(4): 156-165. DOI:10.1108/02652320110392527
[29]Putnam R D. What makes democracy work?[J]. National Civic Review, 1993, 82(2): 101-107. DOI:10.1002/ncr.4100820204
[30]Staiger D, Stock J H. Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments[J]. Econometrica, 1997, 65(3): 557-586. DOI:10.2307/2171753
Cite this article
Guo Feng, Wang Yaopei. Traditional Financial Basis,Knowledge Threshold and Digital Finance for Farmers[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2020, 46(1): 19-33.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES