, 1
10714 
8277As the economy has been becoming more knowledge-based and the process of globalization has been accelerating, patent portfolio has become an important aspect of key competitive advantages. Patents make great contributions for firms to protect and benefit from their innovation and are essential for firms’ competence, survival, and development. Previous research has studied patent strategy by scholars of different disciplines from different perspectives. However, an integrated and consistent theoretical framework has not been developed on how firms could initiate suitable patent strategies which fit the dynamic environment. In order to improve the theoretical framework of patent strategy and provide a theoretical basis for firms’ patent management practice in China, by searching and reorganizing literature in recent 10 years, this paper conducts a literature review on the choice of patent strategy including whether to adopt patents to protect innovation and how to leverage patents to generate value from the perspective of strategic fit. We focus on the fit between patent strategy and micro environment, meso environment, and macro environment. We integrate the recent development of patent strategy literature, grasp the research frontier, and construct a theoretical framework on firm patent strategy. This paper holds theoretical implications for patent strategy research by integrating ideas in the literature and giving a consistent framework, and also has practical implications for firms’ patent management practice. Furthermore, based on the literature review, we suggest that future research should put more attention on the following aspects. First, research on patent operation should be extended. Second, since prior research mainly focused on developed economies, future research should study patent strategy in transition economies. Third, patent strategy literature should be expanded by providing insights on micro level mechanisms. Fourth, since prior research ignored the impact of networks on patent strategy, scholars should study patent strategy from the social network perspective. Fifth, cross-level research may extend patent strategy research by integrating factors from the macro, meso, and micro level. Finally, considering the dynamic essence of patent strategy, more dynamic research is needed to improve our theoretical understanding of patent strategy.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
A Literature Review on the Strategic Fit between Patent Strategy and Environment
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 41, Issue 01, pp. 3 - 15 (2019) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2019.01.001
Summary
References
Summary
Keywords
1 Jiang Binbin, Kuang Haibo. A research on the choice of patent strategy and its innovative effect of market－driven alliance firms [J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(1): 70-80.
2 Liu Linqing, Xia Qinghua. Research on the basic logic of patent strategy under the background of complex product system. Foreign Economics & Management, 2006, 28(9): 8-15.
3 Mao Hao, Liu Cheng, Lin Han. An empirical study on non－implementation patent application motives of Chinese enterprises based on surveys [J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(1): 73-81.
4 Wang Qin, Gao Shangxing. Strategic motives of patent application—empirical evidence and policy implications [J]. R&D Management, 2015, 27(4): 110-121.
5 Agarwal R, Ganco M, Ziedonis R H. Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: Implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009, 30(13): 1349–1374.
6 Arora A, Athreye S, Huang C. The paradox of openness revisited: Collaborative innovation and patenting by UK innovators[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(7): 1352–1361.
7 Barton J. Competition and competitive uses of intellectual property[A]. Proceedings of the 1998 Stanford workshop on intellectual property and industry competitive standards[C]. Chicago, 1998.
8 Belderbos R, Cassiman B, Faems D, et al. Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners[J]. Research Policy, 2014, 43(5): 841–852.
9 Chabchoub N, Niosi J. Explaining the propensity to patent computer software[J]. Technovation, 2005, 25(9): 971–978.
10 Chen Y M, Liu H H, Liu Y S, et al. A preemptive power to offensive patent litigation strategy: Value creation, transaction costs and organizational slack[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(5): 1634–1638.
11 Choudhury P, Haas M R. Scope versus speed: Team diversity, leader experience, and patenting outcomes for firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(4): 977–1002.
12 De Faria P, Sofka W. Knowledge protection strategies of multinational firms—A cross-country comparison[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(7): 956–968.
13 Ernst H, Fischer M. Integrating the R&D and patent functions: Implications for new product performance[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31(S1): 118–132.
14 Graham S J H, Merges R P, Samuelson P, et al. High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system: Results of the 2008 Berkeley patent survey[J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009, 24(4): 1255–1327.
15 Hall B, Helmers C, Rogers M, et al. The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: A review[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2014, 52(2): 375–423.
16 Hall B H, Ziedonis R H. The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979-1995[J]. The Rand Journal of Economics, 2001, 32(1): 101–128.
17 Hanel P. The Use of intellectual property rights and innovation by manufacturing firms in Canada[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2008, 17(4): 285–309.
18 Hsu D H, Ziedonis R H. Resources as dual sources of advantage: Implications for valuing entrepreneurial-firm patents[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34(7): 761–781.
19 Hu A G. Propensity to patent, competition and China’s foreign patenting surge[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(7): 985–993.
20 Huang K G L, Geng X S, Wang H L. Institutional regime shift in intellectual property rights and innovation strategies of firms in China[J]. Organization Science, 2017, 28(2): 355–377.
21 Jell F, Henkel J, Wallin M W. Offensive patent portfolio races[J]. Long Range Planning, 2017, 50(5): 531–549.
22 Keupp M M, Friesike S, Von Zedtwitz M. How do foreign firms patent in emerging economies with weak appropriability regimes? Archetypes and motives[J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41(8): 1422–1439.
23 Kultti K, Takalo T, Toikka J. Secrecy versus patenting[J]. The Rand Journal of Economics, 2007, 38(1): 22–42.
24 Kwon I. Patent races with secrecy[J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 2012, 60(3): 499–516.
25 Li M, Chen X D, Zhang G P. How does firm size affect technology licensing? Empirical evidence from China[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(3): 1249–1269.
26 Li X B. Behind the recent surge of Chinese patenting: An institutional view[J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41(1): 236–249.
27 Mayer K J, Somaya D, Williamson I O. Firm-specific, industry-specific, and occupational human capital and the sourcing of knowledge work[J]. Organization Science, 2012, 23(5): 1311–1329.
28 Milesi D, Petelski N, Verre V. Innovation and appropriation mechanisms: Evidence from Argentine microdata[J]. Technovation, 2013, 33(2-3): 78–87.
29 Moser P. Innovation without patents: Evidence from world’s fairs[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 2012, 55(1): 43–74.
30 Motohashi K. Licensing or not licensing? An empirical analysis of the strategic use of patents by Japanese firms[J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(9), 1548–1555.
31 Paik Y, Zhu F. The impact of patent wars on firm strategy: Evidence from the global smartphone industry[J]. Organization Science, 2016, 27(6): 1397–1416.
32 Pajak S. Do innovative firms rely on big secrets? An analysis of IP protection strategies with the CIS 4 survey[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2016, 25(5): 516–532.
33 Peng M W. An institution-based view of IPR protection[J]. Business Horizons, 2013, 56(2): 135–139.
34 Peng M W, Ahlstrom D, Carraher S M, et al. History and the debate over intellectual property[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2017, 13(1): 15–38.
35 Polidoro F, Toh P K. Letting rivals come close or warding them off? The effects of substitution threat on imitation deterrence[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(2): 369–392.
36 Reitzig M, Puranam P. Value appropriation as an organizational capability: The case of IP protection through patents[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009, 30(7): 765–789.
37 Reitzig M, Wagner S. The hidden costs of outsourcing: Evidence from patent data[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(11): 1183–1201.
38 Rudy B C, Black S L. Attack or defend? The role of institutional context on patent litigation strategies[J]. Journal of Management, 2018, 44(3): 1226–1249.
39 Somaya D. Patent strategy and management: An integrative review and research agenda[J]. Journal of Management, 2012, 38(4): 1084–1114.
40 Somaya D, Williamson I O, Zhang X M. Combining patent law expertise with R&D for patenting performance[J]. Organization Science, 2007, 18(6): 922–937.
41 Soranzo B, Nosella A, Filippini R. Managing firm patents: A bibliometric investigation into the state of the art[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2016, 42: 15–30.
42 Sternitzke C. An exploratory analysis of patent fencing in pharmaceuticals: The case of PDE5 inhibitors[J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(2): 542–551.
43 Tan D. Making the news: Heterogeneous media coverage and corporate litigation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(7): 1341–1353
44 Theeke M, Lee H. Multimarket contact and rivalry over knowledge-based resources[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2017, 38(12): 2508–2531.
45 Torrisi S, Gambardella A, Giuri P, et al. Used, blocking and sleeping patents: Empirical evidence from a large-scale inventor survey[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(7): 1374–1385.
46 Veer T, Berger F, Blind K. The impact of product piracy on corporate IP strategy[J]. R&D Management, 2016, 46(S2): 631–652.
47 Von Graevenitz G, Wagner S, Harhoff D. Incidence and growth of patent thickets: The impact of technological opportunities and complexity[J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 2013, 61(3): 521–563.
48 Wen W, Ceccagnoli M, Forman C. Opening up intellectual property strategy: Implications for open source software entry by start-up firms[J]. Management Science, 2015, 62(9): 2668–2691.
49 Zaby A K. Losing the lead: The patenting decision in the light of the disclosure requirement[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2010, 19(2): 147–164.
50 Zhang J M, Armanios D E, Li J Z. Patenting or secrecy? Defense mechanisms and partnerships: A resource dependence perspective[A]. Academy of management proceedings[C]. Atlanta, 2017.
Cite this article
Justin Tan, Zhao Xiaoyang. A Literature Review on the Strategic Fit between Patent Strategy and Environment[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2019, 41(1): 3-15.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES
