With administrative decentralization and fiscal decentralization, local officials are in control of many important resources such as administrative examination and approval, land acquisition, loan guarantees, and policy preferences. In fact, they have become the main executors of regional economic development and social order stability. However, as far as the personnel system of cadres in our country is concerned, the turnover of local officials is a normal state. In addition, because of the differences of personal experiences and individual characteristics of different officials, their policy preferences in the term of office also exist greater heterogeneity, which leads to the fact that the replacement of officials will affect the operation of enterprises in varying degrees. As a kind of free transfer payment provided by the government to the main body of micro-economic activities, the financial subsidy is also the embodiment of the interaction between the government and enterprises. However, there are few scholars analyze whether the turnover of local officials will affect the acquisition of financial subsidies of enterprises. Based on the sample data of family listed companies from 2007 to 2014, this paper examines the influence of officials turnover on financial subsidies of family firms from the perspective of the turnover of party secretaries of prefecture-level cities. The main conclusions are as follows: First, to some extent, the replacement of officials will break the original relationship between the government and enterprises. Compared with state-owned enterprises, family firms are more vulnerable to the impact of such external shocks, the most direct reflection of which is the reduction of government subsidies. Second, there is a potential assumption that family firms use political connections to gain resource advantages, so they are more vulnerable to the break-up of the relationship between the government and enterprises, as the turnover of officials will affect financial subsidies of enterprises. At present, there are two views on the political relationship: " the view of efficiency” and " the view of rent-seeking”. " The view of efficiency” holds that seeking the political relationship is the best choice for high-quality enterprises when the institutional environment is poor; while " the view of rent-seeking” holds that the political connection is a means of rent-seeking, which cannot be regarded as the standard of judging high-quality enterprises, nor is it conducive to the improvement of economic and social efficiency of enterprises. This study finds that when officials are replaced, financial subsidies of politically affiliated enterprises are more affected, which indicates that the turnover of officials affects the access of rent-seeking enterprises to financial subsidies, and in the process, the " rent-seeking” view of the political connection has been verified. Third, in the regions where the system efficiency is more perfect, the influence of the replacement of officials on financial subsidies of enterprises is weakened. Finally, the further study of this paper finds that when officials are from other provinces and cities, the break of the interest alliance caused by the turnover of officials has a more significant impact on financial subsidies of family firms. In addition, when the performance of enterprises is poor, the influence of officials’ turnover and political connections on financial subsidies of enterprises is more significant. This study has a certain theoretical contribution and practical significance. From the perspective of theoretical contributions, this paper not only expands the research field of the impact of officials’ turnover on enterprises, but also enriches the existing research on financial subsidies, institutional governance and the relationship between government and enterprises. From the perspective of practical significance, this paper believes that at the present stage of economic transformation in China, it is suggested that the current government performance appraisal system should be adjusted to a certain extent, and GDP should no longer be used as a single assessment index. On the contrary, the adjustment of the regional economic structure, the upgrading of the industrial structure, and the ability of regional innovation are more included in the official performance system, so as to guide local officials to allocate limited government subsidies to enterprises with good development prospects, strong innovative capacity, in line with the direction of national strategic development. In addition, market reforms should be further deepened, and institutionalized government subsidy standards should be formed, so that financial subsidies can also form market allocations, thereby maximizing the effectiveness of financial subsidies.
/ Journals / Journal of Finance and Economics
Journal of Finance and Economics
LiuYuanchun, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YaoLan BaoXiaohua HuangJun, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Will Officials’ Turnover Affect Enterprises’ Financial Subsidies? An Empirical Research Based on Chinese Family Firms
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 44, Issue 10, pp. 138 - 152 (2018) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2018.10.010
Summary
References
Summary
[1]. Bu D L, Di L Y. Governance Environment, Equity Investment and Government Subsidy[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2017, (10): 193-206. (In Chinese)
[2]. Cai G W, Huang L X. A study on the Influencing Factors and Economic Performance of Government Level Reform [J]. Management World, 2010, (8): 73-83. (In Chinese)
[3]. Cao C F. Between the Transfer of the Political Power and Corporate Investment: The Logic of China [J]. Management World, 2013, (1): 143-157. (In Chinese)
[4]. Chen L, Chen H L. The Clan Involvement, the Socio-emotional Wealth and the Corporate Charitable Contributions: A Case Study Based on the Survey of the Private Enterprises All over Chin [J]. Management World, 2014, (8): 90-101. (In Chinese)
[5]. Chen Y Y, Luo D L. Local Governors' Turnover and Firms' Investment [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2012, (S2): 18-30. (In Chinese)
[6]. Dai Y Y, Pan Y, Feng S. Are Chinese enterprises’ Charitable Donations “Political Contributions”? --- Evidence from the Replacement of the Municipal Party Secretaries [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2014, (2): 74-86. (In Chinese)
[7]. Dang L, Yang R L, Yang J D. Anti-corruption and Firms Innovation: an explanation based on political connections [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2015, (7): 146-160. (In Chinese)
[8]. Fu Y, Zhang Y. Chinese Style decentralization and Structural Bias in Fiscal Expenditure: The Cost of Competition for Growth [J]. Management World, 2007, (3): 4-12. (In Chinese)
[9]. Gong Q, Xu C Y. Policy Burden and Soft Constraint of Long-term Budget [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2008, (2): 44-55. (In Chinese)
[10]. Guo F, Shi Q L. Official Turnover, Collusion Deterrent and Temporary Improvement of Air Quality [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2017, (7): 155-168. (In Chinese)
[11]. He X G, Zhang Y F, Lian Y L, et al. Political connection and Enterprise value: A Comparative Analysis of Private Enterprises and State-owned Enterprises in China [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2013, (1): 103-115. (In Chinese)
[12]. Hu X Y. The Political Identity of Private Entrepreneur and the Financing Convenience of Private Enterprise--Taking the Top 100 Private Enterprises in Zhejiang Province as an Example [J]. Management World, 2006, (5): 107-113. (In Chinese)
[13]. Kong D M, Liu S S, Wang Y N. Market Competition, Property Right and Government Subsidy [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2013, (2): 55-67. (In Chinese)
[14]. Li L L. The Individual Background of the Owner of Private Enterprise and Enterprise "Success" [J]. Social Sciences in China, 1997, (2): 133-145. (In Chinese)
[15]. Li W J, Zheng M N. Is it Substantive Innovation or Strategic Innovation? --- Impact of Macroeconomic Policies on Micro-enterprises' Innovation [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016, (4): 60-73. (In Chinese)
[16]. Luo D L, Liu X L. Political Relations, Barriers to Entry and Firm Performance: An empirical Evidence from Private Listed Companies in China [J]. Management World, 2009, (5): 97-106. (In Chinese)
[17]. Pan Y, Ning B, Xiao J L. The Transfer of Local Political Power and the Reconstruction of the Relationship between Government and Enterprise: Evidence from the Replacement of Local officials and the Change of Executives. Chinese Industrial Economics[J], 2015, (6): 135-147. (In Chinese)
[18]. Shen Y, Fu L L, Zhao J M. An Empirical Study on the Influence of Municipal Party Committee replacement on Enterprise Rent-seeking [J]. Chinese Industrial Economics, 2015, (9): 37-52. (In Chinese)
[19]. Song L Y, Wang X B, Xu X X. Local officials induce Industrial Structure Change[J]. Economics (Quarterly), 2012, (1): 71-92. (In Chinese)
[20]. Sun Z, Liu F W, Li Z Q. Marketization, Government Intervention and Debt Maturity Sructure: An Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in China [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2005, (5): 52-63. (In Chinese)
[21]. Wang F X. A Study on the Financial Subsidy of Local Governments to Local Competitive Enterprises in China [D]. Tianjin: Nankai University, 2005. (In Chinese)
[22]. Wu W F, Wu C F, Rui M. Executives’ Government Background and Tax Incentives of Listed Companies in China [J]. Management World, 2009, (3): 134-142. (In Chinese)
[23]. Xu Y K, Qian X H, Li W A. Political Uncertainty, Political Connection and Private Enterprise Investment: Evidence from Municipal Party Committee Replacement [J]. Managing the world, 2013, (5): 116-130. (In Chinese)
[24]. Yu M G, Hui Y P, Pan H B. Political Connection, Rent-seeking and Effectiveness of Local Government Financial subsidy [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2010, (3): 65-77. (In Chinese)
[25]. Yu W, Wang M J, Jin X R. Political Connections and Financing Constraints: Information Effect and Resource Effect [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2012, (9): 125-139. (In Chinese)
[26]. Zhang J J, Zhang Z X. The Political Strategy of Private Entrepreneur in China [J]. Management World, 2005, (7): 94-105. (In Chinese)
[27]. Zhang X J, Xu J, Xu L B. Can Executive Elite Governance Model Improve Firm Performance? A Study based on the Moderating Effect of Social Association [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2015, (3): 100-114. (In Chinese)
[28]. Zhao C, Wang Z Q, Yang D M, et al. Research on the Catering Behavior of Enterprise and Government Subsidy Performance Based on the Analysis of Enterprises Profitability[J]. China Industrial Economics. 2015, (7): 130-145. (In Chinese)
[29]. Zhou L A. Research on the Promotion Championship Model of Chinese Local officials [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2007, (7): 36-50. (In Chinese)
[30]. Zhou Y A, Feng X Y, Zhao J Y. Competition of Local Government and Reconstruction of Market Order [J]. Social Sciences in China, 2004, (1): 56-65. (In Chinese)
[31]. Zhu B, Li L L. Government subsidy and Private Enterprise R&D Investment [J]. Society, 2014, (4): 165-1866. (In Chinese)
[32]. Allison P D. Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis[J]. Sociological Methodology, 1990,20:93-114.
[33]. Arellano M, Bond S. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,1991, 58(2): 277-297.
[34]. Arellano M, Bover O. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models[J]. Journal of Econometrics,1995,68(1): 29-51.
[35]. Blundell R, Bond S. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models[J]. Journal of Econometrics,1998,87(1): 115-143.
[36]. Chen C J P, Li Z Q, Su X J, et al. Rent-seeking incentives, corporate political connections, and the control structure of private firms: Chinese evidence[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2011, 17(2): 229-243.
[37]. Frye T, Shleifer A. The invisible hand and the grabbing hand[J]. The American Economic Review, 1997, 87(2) :354-358.
[38]. Julio B, Yook Y. Political uncertainty and corporate investment cycles[J]. The Journal of Finance,2012,67(1): 45-83.
[39]. Li J, Zhou C H, Zajac E J. Control, collaboration, and productivity in international joint ventures: Theory and evidence[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2009,30(8): 865-884.
[40]. Peng M W, Heath P S. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: institutions, organizations, and strategic choice[J]. Academy of Management Review,1996,21(2): 492-528.
[41]. Pfeffer J, Salancik G R. Social control of organizations[A]. Pfeffer J, Salancik G R. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective[M]. New York, NY: Stanford University Press, 1978: 406-421.
[42]. Wank D L. The institutional process of market clientelism: Guanxi and private business in a South China city[J]. The China Quarterly,1996,147: 820-838.
Cite this article
Zhu Lina, He Xuan, Shao Renwei, et al. Will Officials’ Turnover Affect Enterprises’ Financial Subsidies? An Empirical Research Based on Chinese Family Firms[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2018, 44(10): 138-152.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES